AI News

  • Loading...

Why You Should Run AI Agents Inside Windows Sandbox

On
Why You Should Run AI Agents Inside Windows Sandbox

The first time you let an AI agent run loose on your computer, you'll watch in real-time as it executes commands faster than you can read them. It installs software packages, shuffles files around, tweaks system settings—all on the same Windows installation that holds a decade's worth of tax returns, photo libraries, and work documents. Then comes the moment of truth: the agent runs a cleanup command in a directory you never told it to touch. While no critical data disappeared in this case, the lesson stuck with you: this agent operated with your full permissions, and those permissions could cause serious damage.

Abandoning AI agents isn't realistic right now, so you need a better strategy than just trusting them on your main machine. As it turns out, Windows already includes a built-in solution—a "disposable computer" baked directly into the OS. It's an isolated sandbox environment that spins up in seconds and vanishes completely when you close the window.

Giving Your AI Agent a Throwaway Computer

A pristine Windows desktop that auto-wipes itself when you're done

Cửa sổ Windows Sandbox trên laptop
Cửa sổ Windows Sandbox trên laptop

An AI agent with access to a command-line interface can perform any operation you could perform yourself. Antivirus software won't flag an AI agent that accidentally deletes the wrong folder—there's nothing malicious about the action itself. You could run suspicious programs safely in other ways on Windows, but most alternatives require setting up and maintaining a full virtual machine (VM).

The elegant solution: run your AI agents inside a sandbox—specifically, Windows Sandbox. Think of it as a completely fresh Windows desktop running on Microsoft's hypervisor with its own isolated kernel, completely cut off from your host operating system. When you close the window, everything inside disappears: files, installed software, registry changes—gone. The next time you launch it, you start from a clean slate.

Here's what makes this better than traditional VMs: Windows Sandbox boots in seconds and consumes just 500MB of disk space because it reuses your system's existing Windows files instead of storing a duplicate OS. Enabling it takes minutes through the Windows Features dialog, though you'll usually need to restart your machine to get started.

One catch: Windows Sandbox only works on Pro, Enterprise, and Education editions. If you're running Windows Home, you'll need to explore alternatives.

Creating .wsb Files and Setting Folders to Read-Only

A tiny text file that controls what the agent can see and do

File cấu hình XML cho Windows Sandbox với tính năng mạng bị vô hiệu hóa và các thư mục được ánh xạ
File cấu hình XML cho Windows Sandbox với tính năng mạng bị vô hiệu hóa và các thư mục được ánh xạ

By default, a sandbox is just an empty desktop with internet access. That works fine for testing installers, but AI agents need stricter guardrails. Windows Sandbox reads these rules from a plain-text configuration file with a .wsb extension:

<Configuration>
<Networking>Disable</Networking>
<ClipboardRedirection>Disable</ClipboardRedirection>
<ProtectedClient>Enable</ProtectedClient>
<MappedFolders>
<MappedFolder>
<HostFolder>C:\\Users\\Tashreef\\Projects</HostFolder>
<SandboxFolder>C:\\Users\\WDAGUtilityAccount\\Desktop\\Projects</SandboxFolder>
<ReadOnly>true</ReadOnly>
</MappedFolder>
</MappedFolders>
</Configuration>

Here's what each setting does: `Networking` set to `Disable` cuts off the sandbox's internet connection, preventing anything inside from phoning home or downloading malicious content. `ClipboardRedirection` set to `Disable` blocks data from being copied between the sandbox and your main system through the shared clipboard. `ProtectedClient` adds an extra AppContainer boundary around the sandbox process itself—a safety layer in case any threat breaks through the first line of defense.

The `MappedFolder` block exposes a folder from your real computer inside the sandbox. With `ReadOnly` set to `true`, the agent can read your project files but can't modify anything. That odd-looking path? `WDAGUtilityAccount` is the default user account for every sandbox session, so mapped folders show up on this account's desktop.

If you're running Windows 11 version 24H2 or later, there's also a command-line tool called `wsb` that automates much of this. The `start` command launches a sandbox from a config file, `list` shows running sessions, `exec` runs commands inside the sandbox, and `share` maps folders instantly. The `connect`, `ip`, and `stop` commands handle everything else. One warning though: be careful with `wsb share --allow-write`. This flag grants write permissions to a real folder, and you should only use it when you genuinely need to.

What Doesn't Get Protected?

Important technical details you need to know

The mapped folder feature deserves special attention. If you map a folder with write permissions enabled, any changes the sandbox makes will persist on your real machine even after the session ends.

Network access is the second trap. It's enabled by default, so if you launch a standard sandbox from the Start menu instead of using a carefully configured .wsb file, you've just handed the agent full internet access.

There are a few other limitations worth knowing. The graphical interface only lets you run one sandbox at a time. Commands executed in .wsb files can't capture output, meaning you only get an exit code—not what the command actually displayed. All data wipes clean after each session, and windows can be surprisingly stubborn about resizing.

Beyond these quirks, certain workloads simply don't belong in a disposable environment. Anything requiring long-term runtime, persistent storage, or communication between multiple machines should run on a proper VM, Docker container, or LXC setup—tools designed for stable, sustained operations.

Test Your AI Agent Experiments in Sandbox Today

Windows Sandbox excels at short-lived, high-risk, repeatable tasks—which describes AI agent sessions perfectly. A practical setup includes a few .wsb files on your desktop with networking disabled, clipboard sharing blocked, and project folders mapped read-only. Your AI agent gets complete freedom to operate on its virtual machine without threatening your actual system. When work is done, close the window and walk away. What initially sounds like a weakness—losing everything when you close the app—is actually the whole point.


Description: Discover how Windows Sandbox protects your system from rogue AI agents. Learn configuration tips and security best practices.

Related Articles

Claude Cowork vs ChatGPT Work: Which AI Assistant Actually Gets Work Done?

Claude Cowork vs ChatGPT Work: Which AI Assistant Actually Gets Work Done?

Plenty of people are already dropping money on the Pro versions of both Claude and ChatGPT. After weeks of serious hands-on testing, though, they keep asking themselves the same question: which one can I actually trust to handle work independently? That's exactly what Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work promise to deliver. We ran both through identical tasks, and the winner emerged in surprising fashion—plus, you'll finally know which one deserves your subscription money.

What exactly do these tools do?

It's more than just raw speed

Claude Cowork interface open on MacBook
Claude Cowork interface open on MacBook

Before deciding which tool wins, we need to understand what each one actually does. The names sound nearly identical, but their approaches to work are fundamentally different.

Claude Cowork is Anthropic's answer to an agentic AI workspace. Rather than asking a question and waiting for an answer, you assign it a task and let it run. It can search local files, process projects across multiple documents, research information online, and integrate with tools like Slack and Teams. It builds documents, presentations, and spreadsheets as it works. Depending on what you ask, a task might finish in minutes or take hours.

ChatGPT Work follows a similar philosophy but pushes further in some directions. You hand over an entire workflow, and it researches, connects apps, uses local files, and completes the job autonomously. It can build websites, schedule recurring tasks, handle repetitive work, and monitor ongoing processes.

Test 1: Handling recurring tasks like a real coworker

Tasks scheduled in Claude Cowork
Tasks scheduled in Claude Cowork

For a fair comparison, we gave both tools the same three tasks and watched how each one handled them. First up: a simple but practical recurring task. Imagine you need to post a message to a Google Chat group every weekday. Instead of remembering to do it yourself, hand it off to AI.

Claude Cowork went first. We connected it to Google Chat, explained what we needed, and let it run for a week. Surprisingly, it worked perfectly. Messages posted on time during the week, skipped weekends as intended. Then we set up the same workflow in ChatGPT Work. Setup took longer—considerably longer—but once running, the results were essentially identical: messages on weekdays, nothing on weekends.

ChatGPT Work plugins for Google Chat
ChatGPT Work plugins for Google Chat

On paper, that's a tie. Both finished the job well. But the actual experience felt completely different.

  • Claude felt collaborative from the start. Before setting anything up, it asked questions, dug into what you actually wanted, and offered multiple options to clarify. It didn't rush. It waited until it really understood the task.
  • ChatGPT Work did the opposite. It moved faster initially, yet ironically, total setup time was longer. The back-and-forth was thinner, so you never got the sense it was trying to understand the bigger context behind your request.

What's interesting here is that for recurring tasks, that careful attention matters. Both completed the job, but Claude made you feel confident delegating from day one. Round 1 goes to Claude.

Test 2: Cleaning up a messy file directory

Sorting and renaming files with Claude Cowork
Sorting and renaming files with Claude Cowork

For test two, we wanted to see how each handled data stored directly on the machine. Say you have a folder full of photos that need renaming—exactly the kind of repetitive work people happily hand off to AI.

We gave both Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work access to the same folder and used identical instructions for each. Then we let them work and watched what happened.

ChatGPT Work nailed it. It understood how you wanted the files named, processed the entire directory, renamed everything correctly, and even sent a notification when done. You didn't have to babysit it or constantly check progress.

Claude Cowork understanding context through clarifying questions
Claude Cowork understanding context through clarifying questions

Yes, the process took time. But honestly, for this type of work, nobody cares. When you delegate to AI, you care whether it does the job right, not whether it saves you five minutes. And in this case, it absolutely did the job right. Claude handled the same task beautifully too, with similar quality results. The real concern is that both delivered—which makes round two a draw.

Test 3: Building an entire presentation from scratch

This is where the conversation changed everything

Key points about the presentation in ChatGPT Work
Key points about the presentation in ChatGPT Work

For the third and final test, we upped the difficulty significantly. The task: build a complete presentation from scratch. We provided research data, supporting files, and necessary documents, then gave both Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work identical detailed instructions. Both started with the same brief. No surprise—neither finished in minutes. The volume of information to process was huge, so both needed time.

Claude Cowork delivered superior results. It followed the template we provided, understood exactly how we wanted information presented, and produced something nearly ready to go. Crucially, like in test one, Claude took time upfront to ensure it understood our needs before diving into work.

ChatGPT Work chatbot on MacBook
ChatGPT Work chatbot on MacBook

ChatGPT Work did finish a presentation, but it had noticeable issues. That meant revisions, additional instructions, and way more back-and-forth than we wanted. When you're constantly correcting mistakes, the entire appeal of delegation evaporates. Real delegation means fewer conversations, not more. The third round wasn't close—Claude Cowork wins decisively.

The verdict: Which one should you buy?

ChatGPT Work objectively has more features. Sites, task scheduling, image generation, and the ability to handle longer, more complex workflows give it genuine advantages. On paper, that's compelling.

But after actually using both? Get Claude Cowork instead. It takes time to understand your needs, clarifies gaps when necessary, and then completes work without constant intervention. That's what you actually want in an AI coworker. At $20/month, Claude Cowork will earn its place in your workflow and convince you to keep paying.


Description: We tested Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work head-to-head across three real tasks. Here's which one you should actually pay for.

Related Articles

Gemini Now Lets You Create Images by Speaking—No Typing Required

On
Gemini Now Lets You Create Images by Speaking—No Typing Required

Forget typing out lengthy, complicated prompts. Gemini Live has just made image creation ridiculously simple—just speak your idea and watch it come to life. Instead of laboriously describing every detail like style, background, clothing, and color, you can now have a natural conversation with Gemini using voice commands. It's a genuinely useful upgrade if you've ever felt bogged down by the need to write perfect text prompts.

What's interesting here is that this voice-powered image creation and editing feature runs on Nano Banana 2, Gemini's image generation technology. Even when you throw a simple, vague idea at it, Gemini Live understands what you mean and delivers surprisingly polished results. So how exactly does voice-to-image work in Gemini Live? Let's break it down step by step.

How to Create Images with Gemini Live Using Your Voice

On the main Gemini interface, tap the Live icon to get started. Once you're in Gemini Live, tap the camera icon to scan an object or subject.

Let's say I want to create a new image of a vase through voice commands. Point your camera at the object, then clearly state what you want to create. Gemini Live will then process your request and generate fresh content based on your instructions.

Changing Style and Appearance

For example:

Make the vase red

The vase will instantly shift to red.

Biến đổi hình ảnh bằng giọng nói Gemini Live

Keep the vase shape but transform it into Japanese-style pottery

Đổi phong cách ảnh qua giọng nói Gemini Live

Render this image in pencil sketch style

Đổi phong cách qua giọng nói trên Gemini Live

Add a chicken next to the vase

Thêm chi tiết vào ảnh qua giọng nói trên Gemini Live

You can also experiment with commands like:

  • Transform the vase into minimalist Scandinavian design
  • Change the material to clear glass
  • Make it look like a luxury home decor piece
  • Redesign it in a futuristic style
  • Keep the shape but switch the color to cobalt blue

Placing the Vase in Different Environments

Try something like:

Put the vase in a beautifully decorated modern living room

Tạo không gian mới qua giọng nói trên Gemini Live

Then continue:

Now place it in a Japanese-style room

And follow up with:

Switch to a vintage-style coffee shop instead

You have complete freedom to move the vase wherever your imagination takes you.

Turning the Vase into a Product Advertisement

Create a magazine cover image for me

Tạo sản phẩm quảng cáo qua giọng nói trên Gemini Live

Or go more detailed:

Turn this vase into a high-end product advertisement photo—place it on a white marble table with studio lighting and a minimalist background

Then add:

  • Add white tulips inside the vase
  • Add the text 'Elegance in Every Detail' at the top
  • Make it look like a luxury home brand advertisement

Your generated images will appear in the chat conversation when you exit Gemini Live. From there, you can download them.

Tải ảnh trên Gemini Live

Tips for Speaking Better Prompts to Gemini Live

Even though you're not typing traditional text prompts, you should still describe the important elements clearly. A simple formula that works:

Subject + setting + style + lighting + details to keep or change

Instead of saying: Make me a nice photo, try: Create a portrait of me in a Parisian café with a cinematic style, warm golden lighting, blurred background, and keep my face unchanged.

This descriptive approach gives Gemini way more context to nail your exact vision.

Google has also upgraded Nano Banana 2 to handle complex instructions better, maintain consistent characters, and render text within images more accurately. That means you can hand it detailed requests rather than just tossing out a one-liner.


Description: Say goodbye to long prompts. Gemini Live can now generate and edit images using just your voice. Here's how to master it.

Related Articles

Can Gemma 4 Replace ChatGPT for Spreadsheet Analysis? We Tested It

Can Gemma 4 Replace ChatGPT for Spreadsheet Analysis? We Tested It

Every time Google releases a new open-weights AI model, the internet asks the same question: "Can I use this instead of paying for ChatGPT?" With Gemma 4, that question actually deserves a thorough answer—because for the first time, a free, locally-running model is genuinely capable enough at spreadsheet work to make the comparison meaningful.

We put Gemma 4 and ChatGPT through a series of real-world spreadsheet challenges. Not synthetic test cases, but messy actual data, broken formulas from production environments, and genuine VBA requests pulled from actual projects.

How We Set This Up

For consistency, we ran Gemma 4 (the 27-billion parameter version) locally via Ollama on a standard computer and tested ChatGPT (GPT-4o) through the web interface. Both models received identical prompts, word for word.

We scored each test on three criteria: Did the output actually work? (Does the formula or code run correctly?) How useful was the explanation? (Would a user understand what's happening?) And did it handle edge cases? (Does it account for empty cells, errors, or unusual data patterns?)

Test 1: Data Cleaning—A Messy CSV With Inconsistent Dates and Mixed Formats

The scenario: A 2,000-row CSV export from a legacy CRM system. Dates appear in at least four formats—dd/mm/yyyy, mm-dd-yyyy, yyyy.mm.dd, and plain text like "15 March 2025". Phone numbers mix country codes with local formats. Product names have random capitalization and trailing spaces.

Here's the prompt we gave both models:

I have a CSV with a Date column that mixes dd/mm/yyyy, mm-dd-yyyy, yyyy.mm.dd, and written dates like '15 March 2025'. I need a single formula approach to normalise everything to dd/mm/yyyy in Excel. Also suggest a strategy for cleaning phone numbers that mix +91-XXXXXXXXXX with 0XX-XXXXXXXX formats and product names with inconsistent capitalisation.

Gemma 4's answer was solid. It proposed a nested approach using DATEVALUE combined with TEXT and SUBSTITUTE, and correctly identified that written dates like "15 March 2025" need separate handling. It suggested a helper column strategy—parsing each format using IFERROR and combining them. For phone numbers, it recommended chaining SUBSTITUTE calls to strip dashes and spaces, then using RIGHT to extract the last 10 digits. For product names, it correctly suggested PROPER(TRIM()).

ChatGPT's answer was more polished. It provided a single nested formula using LET to define intermediate variables, making the formula easier to read. It also proactively mentioned Power Query as an alternative—something Gemma 4 didn't. On phone number cleaning, ChatGPT added a warning that certain Indian mobile prefixes could be misinterpreted and suggested a validation step.

Winner: ChatGPT—but not by a landslide. Gemma 4's approach works fine and is production-ready. ChatGPT's answer is more comprehensive, better structured, and shows deeper awareness of real-world edge cases. If you're already familiar with data cleaning strategies, Gemma 4 gives you enough to work with.

Test 2: Pivot Table Logic—Designing and Building Pivot Formulas

The scenario: A sales dataset with Region, Salesperson, Product Category, Quarter, and Revenue columns. We asked each model to propose a suitable Pivot Table layout, then provide SUMIFS formulas for users who need a formula-based approach (common when data updates frequently and you want automatic recalculation).

The prompt:

I have a sales table with Region (North/South/East/West), Salesperson (names), Product Category (Electronics/Furniture/Software), Quarter (Q1-Q4), and Revenue. Suggest a pivot table layout to analyse revenue by region and category, then give me the SUMIFS formulas to replicate this as a formula-based summary table.

Gemma 4 proposed a clear two-dimensional layout with regions as rows and categories as columns—exactly what most analysts want. Its SUMIFS formulas were correct, with proper absolute and relative references. It also suggested adding Grand Total rows and columns using SUM.

ChatGPT created a similar layout but went further. It suggested GETPIVOTDATA for users who prefer actual Pivot Tables, offered SUMPRODUCT as an alternative for older Excel versions, and included formatting tips—color schemes, axis labels, and warnings against 3D charts for executive presentations. It also proposed a filter-based dashboard approach for interactivity.

Winner: ChatGPT. Mainly because of depth and supplementary suggestions that less experienced users find helpful. Gemma 4's core answer is accurate and useful—the SUMIFS formulas work perfectly. The gap here is in "what else should you consider" rather than accuracy.

Test 3: Building VBA Macros—Consolidating Multiple Worksheets

This is where ChatGPT was expected to dominate. It did—but Gemma 4 surprised us.

The task: Write a VBA macro that loops through all worksheets in a workbook (except a "Summary" sheet), copies data from a consistent range (A2 to the last row in column D) on each sheet, and sequentially pastes it into the Summary sheet, adding a source sheet name column.

Gemma 4 produced a working macro. It correctly used For Each ws In ThisWorkbook.Worksheets, included the check If ws.Name <> "Summary", found the last row using Cells(Rows.Count, 1).End(xlUp).Row, and appended data to the Summary sheet. The source sheet name was added to column E. The code ran without errors on our test workbook.

ChatGPT built a more robust version. It included error handling with On Error Resume Next around worksheet operations, added a confirmation dialog at the end showing how many rows were merged, cleared the Summary sheet before writing (with user confirmation), and included comments explaining each section. It also wrapped everything with Application.ScreenUpdating = False for performance.

Winner: ChatGPT—on production quality. Gemma 4's macro works, which is genuinely impressive for a free local model. But ChatGPT's version is what you'd actually want to deploy in a business setting—with error handling, user feedback, and performance optimization. For anyone learning VBA through AI-assisted macro building, both are useful starting points.

Test 4: Chart and Visualization Recommendations

We described a dataset to both models: monthly revenue and customer count for four product lines over two years, aimed at non-technical executives. We asked each model what chart types to use and how to structure the visuals.

Gemma 4 suggested a line chart for revenue trends over time (one line per product), a grouped column chart for comparing product lines by quarter, and a combo chart (line + column) for revenue versus customer count on dual axes. Solid, conventional recommendations.

ChatGPT offered similar suggestions but added sparklines for an executive summary table, a waterfall chart to show year-over-year revenue changes, and specific formatting advice—color palettes, axis label formatting, warnings against 3D charts for exec presentations. It also proposed a dashboard layout with logically ordered charts.

Winner: ChatGPT—on presentation awareness. If you've worked with charts before, Gemma 4's recommendations are perfectly adequate. ChatGPT's advantage lies in design and communication strategy—the kind of advice that separates a technically correct chart from one that actually communicates effectively to stakeholders.

Test 5: Formula Debugging—Diagnosing a Broken Formula

We pasted this broken formula into both models and asked them to identify and fix all issues:

=IFERROR(VLOOKUP(A2,Sheet2!B:F,5,TRUE),"Not Found")+IF(C2>"100",D2*0.1,D2*0.05)

There are multiple problems here: The VLOOKUP match type should probably be FALSE for exact matching; the IF condition compares C2 to the text string "100" instead of the number 100; and IFERROR only wraps the VLOOKUP but the whole expression can still error if the IF part fails.

Gemma 4 caught two of three issues. It correctly identified the TRUE/FALSE match type problem and the text-versus-number comparison in the IF statement. It missed the incomplete IFERROR coverage.

ChatGPT caught all three. It rewrote the formula with IFERROR wrapping the entire expression, changed TRUE to FALSE, removed quotes around 100, and suggested XLOOKUP as a modern alternative for Microsoft 365 users. It also explained why each fix mattered.

Winner: ChatGPT, clearly. Formula debugging requires multi-step reasoning across interacting parts of an expression, and ChatGPT's deeper analysis proved it. That said, Gemma 4 catching two of three is genuinely useful—many users would solve their problem with just those two fixes. For complex formula debugging, though, ChatGPT pulls ahead.

Results Comparison

TaskGemma 4ChatGPTWinnerNotes
CSV data cleaningGood—effective formulas, sound approachExcellent—LET formula, Power Query suggestionChatGPTGemma 4 sufficient for experienced users
Pivot Table logicGood—accurate SUMIFS, clean layoutExcellent—added GETPIVOTDATA, conditional formattingChatGPTCore formulas equally sound
VBA macro creationGood—functional macro, basic structureExcellent—error handling, user feedback, optimizationChatGPTGemma 4 code runs correctly as-is
Chart recommendationsGood—standard recommendations, reliableExcellent—design advice, dashboard layoutChatGPTGemma 4 adequate for experienced analysts
Formula debuggingAdequate—caught 2 of 3 issuesExcellent—found all 3 bugs, modern alternativesChatGPTMulti-layered reasoning favors ChatGPT
Data privacy and controlExcellent—runs entirely local, no data leaves your machineAdequate—cloud-based, data sent to OpenAIGemma 4Critical for sensitive business data
CostFreeFree tier with limits; Plus at $20/monthGemma 4No subscription required, unlimited usage
Speed (after initial load)Fast on GPU, slower on CPUFast and consistentTieDepends on local hardware

Practical Advice

After running these tests and using both models extensively, here's what we'd actually recommend:

Start with Gemma 4 for everyday work. Writing formulas, basic data cleaning logic, simple VBA—Gemma 4 handles all of this well and costs nothing. Install it through Ollama and let it run in the background.

Switch to ChatGPT for complex problems. When you hit something that requires deep multi-step reasoning, code analysis, or production-grade output, move to ChatGPT. The free tier covers most needs; the Plus subscription is worth it if you use it daily.

Use both for learning. Ask Gemma 4 a formula question, then ask ChatGPT the same thing. Compare the approaches. This is genuinely one of the most effective learning strategies available.

Default to Gemma 4 for sensitive data. If you're unsure whether your data belongs in the cloud, the answer is to use a local model. You can always ask ChatGPT again later with anonymized or sample data if you need its extra capability.

The real insight here is that we're finally at a point where "free and local" isn't a consolation prize—it's a genuine alternative for real work. ChatGPT still wins on depth and polish, but Gemma 4 has moved from "interesting experiment" to "actually useful."


Description: We compared Gemma 4 and ChatGPT across five real-world spreadsheet tasks. Here's what we found.

Related Articles

How to Link Spotify with Google Gemini: A Complete Setup Guide

How to Link Spotify with Google Gemini: A Complete Setup Guide

Integrating connected apps into Gemini unlocks a significantly better user experience. Once you pair Spotify with Gemini on your phone, the AI assistant becomes your personal music curator. You can search for and play songs, albums, playlists, or podcasts using simple natural language commands—just ask Gemini to "play that Taylor Swift song" or "find me a podcast about technology."

What's interesting here is that you don't need to open Spotify separately to hunt through your library. Gemini handles the heavy lifting for you. Here's everything you need to know about connecting these two platforms.

What Can Gemini Do with Spotify?

Once Spotify is linked to Gemini, you can use voice commands to trigger several actions.

Playing Music

You can ask Gemini to play:

  • A specific album.
  • A song by a particular artist.
  • A Spotify playlist.
  • Music that matches a mood, activity, or genre.

Example commands:

  1. Play the album [album name] on Spotify.
  2. Play [song name] by [artist name] on Spotify.
  3. Play my Spotify playlist called [playlist name].
  4. Play music for [activity] on Spotify.

Searching for Music

You can request searches for an artist's discography, find songs by lyrics, or discover playlists based on genre, mood, or activity type.

Example commands:

  • Find songs by [artist name].
  • Find the song with the lyrics "[lyrics snippet]".
  • Find me a chill Spotify playlist for relaxing.

Finding and Playing Podcasts

Gemini also lets you search for and play podcasts directly through Spotify.

Example commands:

  • Play the podcast [podcast name] on Spotify.
  • Play the latest episode of [podcast name] on Spotify.
  • Find me a podcast about [topic] on Spotify.

How to Connect Spotify to Gemini

Step 1:

Open Gemini and tap on Your AI Personalizations. Next, select Connected apps.

Step 2:

In the apps list, find Spotify and then enable it. You'll see a connection interface appear where you need to complete the linking process.

After successful linking, you'll see Spotify marked as active and ready to use.

How to Use Spotify on Gemini

Back in the main Gemini chat, type @ in the message box, then tap Spotify to activate it. Now enter your request and wait for Gemini to respond with results.

Keep in mind that Gemini cannot yet perform certain Spotify actions directly through this connection:

  • Create new Spotify playlists.
  • Create Spotify radio stations.
  • Control playback with commands like pause, resume, skip, or go back to the previous track through the Spotify Connected App.

Here's something crucial: Spotify will only play specific songs or podcasts you request if you have a Premium subscription. This means connecting Spotify to Gemini doesn't guarantee that all playback features work the same way on a free account. The real concern is that free users get limited functionality here.

Free account holders can only search for general information through Gemini.

Search Spotify information on Gemini

What Can Spotify Free Users Do with Gemini?

There's a significant gap between what Spotify Free and Premium users can accomplish with Gemini.

  • Spotify Free: Search for songs, artists, playlists, and podcasts only.
  • Spotify Premium: Search capabilities plus the ability to actually play the exact songs or podcasts you request.

1. Find Songs by a Specific Artist

Example: Find all Taylor Swift songs on Spotify.

2. Find Songs Using Lyrics

Example: Find the song with the lyrics "..." on Spotify.

3. Search for Playlists by Genre, Mood, or Activity

Examples:

  • Find relaxation music playlists on Spotify.
  • Find workout music playlists on Spotify.
  • Find jazz music playlists on Spotify.

4. Search for Podcasts by Topic

Examples:

  • Find me a podcast about artificial intelligence on Spotify.
  • Find podcasts about personal finance on Spotify.

Description: Connect Spotify to Gemini and control your music with natural voice commands. Full step-by-step guide included.

Related Articles

How to Change Gemini Live's Voice to Your Preferred Option

On
How to Change Gemini Live's Voice to Your Preferred Option

Gemini Live lets you have hands-free conversations with Google's AI assistant—no typing required. What's particularly useful is that you can generate images using voice commands on Gemini Live without having to type out traditional text prompts.

Beyond that functionality, you have complete control over which voice the assistant uses. Gemini offers multiple voice options depending on your language setting, each with its own unique tone and personality. Here's how to switch voices on your mobile device.

Changing Your Gemini Live Voice on Mobile

Step 1:

Tap the gear icon in the Gemini interface to access settings. Then select Settings from the menu below.

Step 2:

In the settings menu, tap on Gemini Voice to adjust your preferences. You'll see all the available voice options supported for your region and language.

Select a voice to hear a preview, then tap Confirm to apply the new voice to Gemini Live.

Important Notes About Changing Gemini Voices

If you've opened Gemini Settings but can't find the voice change option, there are a few possible reasons. The real concern is that voice options remain limited by language and account eligibility. Google notes that voice customization isn't available for all languages, and you need to be signed into the Gemini app to access this feature.

Here's the good news: you don't need a paid subscription to change voices. Free Gemini users can switch voices too—as long as both your account and language are supported. That said, Google is rolling out Gemini Live updates gradually, so voice options may not be universal yet.

If your account and language meet the requirements but you still don't see the option, make sure your Gemini app is running the latest version from your device's app store.


Description: Learn how to switch between different voice options in Gemini Live on your phone with this step-by-step guide.

Related Articles

Copyright © 2016 QTitHow All Rights Reserved